coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: a double blind randomized controlled trial

Authors

mohammadreza omrani otorhinolaryngologist, sadi hospital, isfahan, iran

behrouz barati assistant professor, department of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery, ayatollah taleghani hospital, shaheed beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

navid omidifar resident, department of clinical and surgical pathology, shiraz university of medical sciences, shiraz, iran

ahmad reza okhovat associate professor, department of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery, isfahan university of medical sciences, isfahan, iran

abstract

normal 0 false false false en-us x-none ar-sa background : coblation tonsillectomy is a new surgical technique and demands further research to be proven as a suitable and standard method of tonsillectomy. this study compares coblation and traditional tonsillectomy techniques in view of their advantages and complications. methods : in a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial information on operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, time needed to regain the normal diet and activity and post-operative hemorrhage were gathered and compared between two groups containing 47 patients in each group. results : we found statistically significant differences in operation time (p < 0.05), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.05), postoperative pain (p < 0.001), time needed to find back the normal diet (p < 0.001) and normal activity (p < 0.001). however, post operation hemorrhage (p > 0.5) was not significantly different between two groups. conclusions : this study revealed a significantly less intra operative or postoperative complications and morbidity in coblation tonsillectomy in comparison with traditional method. coblation was associated with less pain and quick return to normal diet and daily activity. these findings addressed coblation tonsillectomy as an advanced method. keywords : coblation, tonsillectomy, complications

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND Coblation tonsillectomy is a new surgical technique and demands further research to be proven as a suitable and standard method of tonsillectomy. This study compares coblation and traditional tonsillectomy techniques in view of their advantages and complications. METHODS In a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial information on operation time, intraoperative blood lo...

full text

[Coblation tonsillectomy versus blunt dissection tonsillectomy].

OBJECTIVE Compare coblation tonsillectomy with blunt dissection tonsillectomy to see if there is any difference in intraoperative bleeding, operating time, postoperative pain, tonsillar fossae healing and return to normal diet and activities. METHOD A randomised control trial was carried out to compare coblation tonsillectomy with blunt dissection tonsillectomy in 56 patients. The same surgeo...

full text

Harmonic scalpel versus conventional tonsillectomy: a double-blind clinical trial.

We conducted a prospective, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the differences in operating time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain at 3 hours and 1 week, and delayed (>24 hr) bleeding associated with ultrasonic harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy and conventional tonsillectomy. The study was carried out on 28 patients with recurrent tonsillitis and/or adenotonsillar hypertrophy who...

full text

A Randomized, Double-Blind, placebo-Controlled Trial

Method: Five hundred forty-two outpatients with bipolar I (N=360) or 11 (N=182) disorder experiencing a major depressive episode (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of quetiapine (600 or 300 mgl day) or placebo. The prima ry efficacy measure was mean change from base))ne to week 8 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score. Additional efficacy assessments included the H...

full text

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Results: The cumulative number of gadoliniumenhancing MRI lesions during the first 6 months were similar in the -3 fatty acids and placebo groups (median difference, 1; 95% CI, 0 to 3; P=.09). No difference in relapse rate was detected after 6 (median difference, 0; 95% CI, 0 to 0; P=.54) or 24 (median difference, 0; 95% CI, 0 to 0; P=.72) months. The proportion of patients without disability p...

full text

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Trial

The efficacy and safety of pentoxifylline were assessed in 297 adult patients with ischemic stroke in a molticenter, doable-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled trial. Treatment was started within 12 hoars after the stroke onset Study medication was administered intravenously continuously (16 mg/kg/day, maximum 1,200 mg/day) for 3 days and per os (400 mg ti.d.) for the remainder of 28 days....

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later


Journal title:
journal of research in medical sciences

جلد ۱۷، شماره ۱، صفحات ۰-۰

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023